|
Written by Steven
|
|
Wednesday, 18 February 2009 15:16 |
|
Had photo taken with Tunde of Passenger Focus outside Laindon station on Monday to highlight a quite astounding difference in fares, depending on who you by your ticket from. Currently, c2c charges £11.50 for a single between Laindon and Kings Cross (2008 fare was £11.30), while the fare charged by London Underground for the journey between Kings Cross and Laindon is £8.80 (2008 fare was £8.50). The fare quoted on the National Rail website is £10.50. (A similar difference in fares would apply for travel from Thurrock stations to TfL stations)
|
|
Last Updated on Wednesday, 18 February 2009 15:31 |
|
Read more...
|
|
|
Written by Administrator
|
|
Wednesday, 18 February 2009 09:12 |
|
We have been contacted my many people, concerned at the vast fare increases from January, that exceeded the ‘average 6% increase’ much published by the government and rail industry. To take but two examples: Daily ticket, East Tilbury to Barking including LU zones 2356 Old Price: £8.80 New Price £11.20, around a 27% increase. Daily ticket, Grays to Canary Wharf Old price £6.10 New price £8.40, around a 37% increase TRUG have received the following explanation for the increases:
|
|
Read more...
|
|
Written by Administrator
|
|
Wednesday, 18 February 2009 08:33 |
|
From the Echo 30th January 2009 COMMUTERS have praised c2c rail, backing a survey in which passengers have ranked the firm one of the best in the UK. Figures released from the National Passenger Survey show 90 per cent of commuters using the Shoebury to London Fenchurch Street line are satisfied with the service they get. The company was ranked joint top, alongside Chiltern Railways, FirstScotRail and Merseyrail in the survey. |
|
Read more...
|
|
|
Written by Administrator
|
|
Wednesday, 18 February 2009 09:12 |
|
The original plan was to be able to use the extended platform Grays Platform 3, (the one mainly used for the Upminster shuttles) from the May 2008 timetable, this was then rescheduled to December 2008; but because there was no certainty of the work being completed for December at the time the timetable had to be submitted to Network Rail, no timetable changes could be contemplated before May 2009.
|
|
Read more...
|
|
|
|
|
Page 3 of 3 |